...GIVE IT UP (SURRENDER).
In a crassly commercial attempt to build membership, I have convinced The Old Man to add a buffer (namely Augusta), to his personality. Believe me, this was not easy to do. Now that I have a sore throat and a sore butt (and still barely rank in the top 100), please assist me (Augusta) in maintaining this disciplinary action, so that we can all continue the process of connection with Self at the inside edge of our comfort zones, rather than the nether regions. This does not mean that YOU should attempt discipline, not until you give it up. NOTE: For those of you who are appropriately motivated, go ahead and let the old asshole do it his way. It work faster. (See photo.)
In other words, the opposites to be balanced are a) rapid movement for the smaller number of humans who want to advance as quickly as possible, and b) slower, gentler movement for the larger number, who are not quite sure and want to proceed slowly… The vast majority of the spiritual paths offered out there are gentle and loving. That is all I had encountered before Cougina, and that is why I hadn’t gotten anywhere. All serious spiritual paths, not just hermetics, eventually require surrender. Surrender to any thought form, e.g., Jesus, can work, but hermetics has proven that surrender to a living adept works faster. We will try balance both attitudes on our blogs.
Saturday, July 2, 2011
Friday, July 1, 2011
A--HOLES VS. ASSETS
Introductory note: There is an all male club in the Heber-Overgaard area called the A--hole Club. (You can imagine who might be one of the founding members.) The associated all female club is called The Assets.
Cougina has asked me to explain to you how an 87 year old a--hole can snatch up a 54 year old upper middle class urban woman and turn her into an asset. The short answer is that the only alternative offered was to be turned into a frog.
Everyone I have met who knows Cougina, acknowledges the a--hole side of his personality. Some people see, to a greater or lesser degree, other aspects of his personality, but the a--hole is always lurking. He acknowledges that he is the biggest spoiled brat ever to be born. My psychologically oriented friends might say that C is narcissistic (not my OLLU classmates, however, who would never think of making a diagnosis), and they would be technically correct.
Drawing upon the comments of many people I have known, I have the classic “nice girl” personality. My analyst (James Hollis, are you reading?) has invited me to join his 12 step program, Nice People’s Anonymous.
So, how can I be so happy sleeping in a van with him every night and following him around every day? Am I just another codependent? Well… if you’re following the blog, you know that I think he’s the greatest magician since sliced bread. I want a lot more of what he has, and I can’t think of a better way to get it than to spend time with him, so I have been highly motivated to understand, and thus tolerate, his a--holism. (A discussion of his alcoholism will have to wait.)
I can’t say that I fully understand, but here is what I’ve come up with so far. 1. It’s mostly a teaching device. He throws people into a state of judgment. 2. It’s a question of balance, balancing little self with higher Self. 3. It is sometimes just being an a--hole, plain and simple.
TO BE CONTINUED… THE OLD MAN HAS THREATENED TO WHIP ME THIS EVENING IF I DON’T SHUT DOWN RIGHT NOW…
THINK GREEN
BLESSED BE
AGGIE
Cougina has asked me to explain to you how an 87 year old a--hole can snatch up a 54 year old upper middle class urban woman and turn her into an asset. The short answer is that the only alternative offered was to be turned into a frog.
Everyone I have met who knows Cougina, acknowledges the a--hole side of his personality. Some people see, to a greater or lesser degree, other aspects of his personality, but the a--hole is always lurking. He acknowledges that he is the biggest spoiled brat ever to be born. My psychologically oriented friends might say that C is narcissistic (not my OLLU classmates, however, who would never think of making a diagnosis), and they would be technically correct.
Drawing upon the comments of many people I have known, I have the classic “nice girl” personality. My analyst (James Hollis, are you reading?) has invited me to join his 12 step program, Nice People’s Anonymous.
So, how can I be so happy sleeping in a van with him every night and following him around every day? Am I just another codependent? Well… if you’re following the blog, you know that I think he’s the greatest magician since sliced bread. I want a lot more of what he has, and I can’t think of a better way to get it than to spend time with him, so I have been highly motivated to understand, and thus tolerate, his a--holism. (A discussion of his alcoholism will have to wait.)
I can’t say that I fully understand, but here is what I’ve come up with so far. 1. It’s mostly a teaching device. He throws people into a state of judgment. 2. It’s a question of balance, balancing little self with higher Self. 3. It is sometimes just being an a--hole, plain and simple.
TO BE CONTINUED… THE OLD MAN HAS THREATENED TO WHIP ME THIS EVENING IF I DON’T SHUT DOWN RIGHT NOW…
THINK GREEN
BLESSED BE
AGGIE
GOING IN CIRCLES
NATURE'S TOILET PAPER: Cougina calls this humble looking plant MULLIN. I agree that it is the greatest outdoor toilet paper I have ever encountered. Supersoft fuzzy leaves... (I rate snow #2, based on its cleaning qualities, but it is too cold to rank #1.)
NOTE: This blog is transitioning to a mostly traveling blog. The serious hermetic discussions will be on COVINA HERMETICIA.
After the dancing, business in Heber was very slow, and Cougina decided we should take a vacation. So, we took a beautiful drive through the high forest plateau to Flagstaff, then parked the van among the ecologically maintained (brush thinned for health and fire protection) pines in national forest, just 1 1/2 miles from the Circle K (access to the staples: beer, ice, and cigarettes)... On the second day I exercised my receptive abilities, and achieved expansion. (If you wonder what that means, ask about it on Covina Hermeticia.)... We drove back to Heber, ready to spend the weekend. We found that Heber, a town that takes pride in its impressive 4th of July fireworks celebration (including cannon fire at dawn) has canceled its fireworks display for the first time in 47 years. What are the poor vendors to do? We spent the evening relaxing in Max's hot tub and enjoying excellent conversation, and then sucked it up and... drove to Cottonwood and its heat, hoping to sell a few hats. Sitting here blogging and selling a few hats.
NOTE: This blog is transitioning to a mostly traveling blog. The serious hermetic discussions will be on COVINA HERMETICIA.
After the dancing, business in Heber was very slow, and Cougina decided we should take a vacation. So, we took a beautiful drive through the high forest plateau to Flagstaff, then parked the van among the ecologically maintained (brush thinned for health and fire protection) pines in national forest, just 1 1/2 miles from the Circle K (access to the staples: beer, ice, and cigarettes)... On the second day I exercised my receptive abilities, and achieved expansion. (If you wonder what that means, ask about it on Covina Hermeticia.)... We drove back to Heber, ready to spend the weekend. We found that Heber, a town that takes pride in its impressive 4th of July fireworks celebration (including cannon fire at dawn) has canceled its fireworks display for the first time in 47 years. What are the poor vendors to do? We spent the evening relaxing in Max's hot tub and enjoying excellent conversation, and then sucked it up and... drove to Cottonwood and its heat, hoping to sell a few hats. Sitting here blogging and selling a few hats.
Wednesday, June 29, 2011
REFLECTION A LA HERMETICA
Reviewing the most basic principles of optics, light rays incident on the horizontal interface between materials of different density (composition) are both reflected and refracted. The diagram above shows an incident light ray traveling through air, and striking a pane of glass. The reflected light ray is shown in the upper right quadrant of the diagram, and the refracted ray in the lower right.
Although adepts are able to visualize both reflection and refraction (the process of auric vision), human eyes have trained themselves to see only reflected light. What humans see is the color that is not absorbed. So, if you see blue, the color of the item is actually everything but blue, and is reflecting the blue. This is true of everything you see, no matter what color it may be.
We must recognize that auric vision is inclusive of all of your five senses. I have many students that have auric smell and taste, yet have trouble dealing with refracted light. For now we will discuss reflected light. The incident light that actually allows you to see the reflected light is invisible. We’ve all seen how prisms bend light passing through them to create the entire spectrum of visible light. Because the crystal has already bent the light, the colors reflect, but you do not see the incoming light. Much more about this will be coming in the post on refracted light.
One of the more common problems that people create for themselves is wearing reflective color that actually weakens chakra areas in parts of their bodies where they may be experiencing difficulties. For example, if someone suffers migraine headaches, we are dealing with the purple chakra, the 6th chakra. As higher self attempts to send energy to your physical vehicle to assist you in maintaining health, equilibrium, and happiness, if you wear your purple blouse, you are reflecting that particular light which would be most helpful away from you. As another example, if you had an abdominal problem, you obviously would not want to wear yellow. If you had a heart problem, you would not want to wear green..
In conjunction with this, it is important to realize that energy comes in on the left and out on the right. Theosophically, the strongest position of intake is the little finger of the left hand. If you wear a reflective ring, e.g., turquoise, lapis lazuli, chrysicolla, you will stop that energy from being absorbed in your body. So, for example if you had COPD, asthma, sinusitis, sore throat, or difficulty expressing yourself, even on a test at school, (all 5th/blue chakra issues) wearing this reflective blue stone would only impede higher self from supplying you with the necessary energy to heal or to improve your expressive ability. Conversely, that same stone or ring worn on the right would hold that energy in and promote healing. On the other hand, if you are going out for a job interview or taking a test, you certainly would not want that reflective blue stone on the right hand, because it would impede you from expressing outwardly.
Let’s take the case of a person with diabetes or a strong disposition to diabetes and apply the basic Hermetic and ayurvedic principles. What should we do? 1. Do not wear yellow. 2. A reflective yellow stone on the right would help hold in the energy from higher self and assist you in healing, or at least controlling this. 3. Of course, the wearing of a refractive yellow, whether it be citrine, yellow, chrysoberyl, heliodor, or yellow sapphire would greatly enhance your control and healing ability in this instance. Following these basic principles, you are certainly capable of reviewing self and things you wish to do, and applying them to any part of your vehicle.
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO REALIZE THAT GOLD IS A STABILIZER. IF YOU ARE TRYING TO CURE OR CREATE SOMETHING, TO GET BETTER, OR TO ENHANCE SOMETHING, YOUR STONE SHOULD BE SET IN STERLING SILVER. HOWEVER, IF YOU ARE TRYING TO STABILIZE AN ISSUE, I.E., MAINTAIN IT THE WAY IT IS, YOU WOULD USE GOLD. THIS TYPE OF INFORMATION CAN BE VERY BENEFICIAL.
ANYONE WHO REALLY WISHES TO USE THESE PRINCIPLES TO CONTROL THEIR HEALTH AND HAPPINESS IS ENCOURAGED TO APPLY FOR A FREE 24 HOUR PREVIEW OF THE SUBSCRIPTION BLOG COVINA HERMETICIA. FOR MORE INFO EMAIL couginamachek@aol.com
PLEASE THINK GREEN
BLESSED BE
COUGINA
Monday, June 27, 2011
PLEASE BE PATIENT
I beg of you to understand that while I may be a minimalist, I am an extremely busy man. Finally, today, thanks to Patti, we had an opportunity to take three days off. So far during those three days, I’ve done three Skype interviews, and have not had time to make jewelry that has been paid for. I will have to make it tomorrow. I have responsibilities to the community that must be fulfilled, as well as responsibilities to my partner, and the continued development of the blog, Covina Hermeticia.
I do spend four hours per night dealing with community issues, and I would really appreciate the opportunity to get some rest. Unfortunately, we will have to continue with the Covina Hermeticia security issues, and other pressing world issues. I only ask that I be allowed a little bit of space during this time. If you can find new people, who might possibly be interested in Covina Hermeticia, it would relieve some of my stress. However, I would really appreciate 36 hours of down time. I love you all so very, very much. Please to continue to
THINK GREEN
BLESSED BE
COUGINA
Michele Bachmann, Republican Wing Nut
Michele Bachmann's Holy War
The Tea Party contender may seem like a goofball, but be warned: Her presidential campaign is no laughing matter
Illustration by Victor Juhasz
It may be the hardest thing you ever do, for Michele Bachmann is almost certainly the funniest thing that has ever happened to American presidential politics. Fans of obscure 1970s television may remember a short-lived children's show called Far Out Space Nuts, in which a pair of dimwitted NASA repairmen, one of whom is played by Bob (Gilligan) Denver, accidentally send themselves into space by pressing "launch" instead of "lunch" inside a capsule they were fixing at Cape Canaveral. This plot device roughly approximates the political and cultural mechanism that is sending Michele Bachmann hurtling in the direction of the Oval Office.
Bachmann is a religious zealot whose brain is a raging electrical storm of divine visions and paranoid delusions. She believes that the Chinese are plotting to replace the dollar bill, that light bulbs are killing our dogs and cats, and that God personally chose her to become both an IRS attorney who would spend years hounding taxpayers and a raging anti-tax Tea Party crusader against big government. She kicked off her unofficial presidential campaign in New Hampshire, by mistakenly declaring it the birthplace of the American Revolution. "It's your state that fired the shot that was heard around the world!" she gushed. "You are the state of Lexington and Concord, you started the battle for liberty right here in your backyard."
I said lunch, not launch! But don't laugh. Don't do it. And don't look her in the eyes; don't let her smile at you. Michele Bachmann, when she turns her head toward the cameras and brandishes her pearls and her ageless, unblemished neckline and her perfect suburban orthodontics in an attempt to reassure the unbeliever of her non-threateningness, is one of the scariest sights in the entire American cultural tableau. She's trying to look like June Cleaver, but she actually looks like the T2 skeleton posing for a passport photo. You will want to laugh, but don't, because the secret of Bachmann's success is that every time you laugh at her, she gets stronger.
In modern American politics, being the right kind of ignorant and entertainingly crazy is like having a big right hand in boxing; you've always got a puncher's chance. And Bachmann is exactly the right kind of completely batshit crazy. Not medically crazy, not talking-to-herself-on-the-subway crazy, but grandiose crazy, late-stage Kim Jong-Il crazy — crazy in the sense that she's living completely inside her own mind, frenetically pacing the hallways of a vast sand castle she's built in there, unable to meaningfully communicate with the human beings on the other side of the moat, who are all presumed to be enemies.
Bachmann's story, to hear her tell it, is about a suburban homemaker who is chosen by God to become a politician who will restore faith and family values to public life and do battle with secular humanism. But by the time you've finished reviewing her record of lies and embellishments and contradictions, you'll have no idea if she actually believes in her own divine inspiration, or whether it's a big con job. Or maybe both are true — in which case this hard-charging challenger for the GOP nomination is a rare breed of political psychopath, equal parts crazed Divine Wind kamikaze-for-Jesus and calculating, six-faced Machiavellian prevaricator. Whatever she is, she's no joke.
Bachmann was born Michele Amble in Waterloo, Iowa, to a pair of lifelong Democrats, but grew up in tiny Anoka, Minnesota. By her teen years, her parents had divorced; her mother remarried and brought step-siblings into the home, creating a Brady Bunchian group of nine kids. One of Bachmann's step-siblings, Helen LaFave, would later come out as a lesbian, a fact that Michele, who became famous opposing gay marriage, never mentions on the campaign trail. For the most part, though, Bachmann's upbringing seems like pure Americana, a typical Midwestern girl who was "in a couple of beauty pageants" and "not overtly political," according to her stepbrother Michael LaFave.
Young Michele found Jesus at age 16, not long before she went away to Winona State University and met a doltish, like-minded believer named Marcus Bachmann. After finishing college, the two committed young Christians moved to Oklahoma, where Michele entered one of the most ridiculous learning institutions in the Western Hemisphere, a sort of highway rest area with legal accreditation called the O.W. Coburn School of Law; Michele was a member of its inaugural class in 1979.
Originally a division of Oral Roberts University, this august academy, dedicated to the teaching of "the law from a biblical worldview," has gone through no fewer than three names — including the Christian Broadcasting Network School of Law. Those familiar with the darker chapters in George W. Bush's presidency might recognize the school's current name, the Regent University School of Law. Yes, this was the tiny educational outhouse that, despite being the 136th-ranked law school in the country, where 60 percent of graduates flunked the bar, produced a flood of entrants into the Bush Justice Department.
Regent was unabashed in its desire that its graduates enter government and become "change agents" who would help bring the law more in line with "eternal principles of justice," i.e., biblical morality. To that end, Bachmann was mentored by a crackpot Christian extremist professor named John Eidsmoe, a frequent contributor to John Birch Society publications who once opined that he could imagine Jesus carrying an M16 and who spent considerable space in one of his books musing about the feasibility of criminalizing blasphemy.
This background is significant considering Bachmann's leadership role in the Tea Party, a movement ostensibly founded on ideas of limited government. Bachmann says she believes in a limited state, but she was educated in an extremist Christian tradition that rejects the entire notion of a separate, secular legal authority and views earthly law as an instrument for interpreting biblical values. As a legislator, she not only worked to impose a ban on gay marriage, she also endorsed a report that proposed banning anyone who "espoused or supported Shariah law" from immigrating to the U.S. (Bachmann seems so unduly obsessed with Shariah law that, after listening to her frequent pronouncements on the subject, one begins to wonder if her crazed antipathy isn't born of professional jealousy.)
This discrepancy may account for why some Tea Party leaders don't buy Bachmann as a champion of small government. "Michele Bachmann is — what's the old-school term? — a poser," says Chris Littleton, an Ohio Tea Party leader troubled by her support of the Patriot Act and other big-government interventions. "Look at her record and see how 'Tea Party' she really is."
When Bachmann finished her studies in Oklahoma, Marcus instructed her to do her postgraduate work in tax law — a command Michele took as divinely ordained. She would later profess to complete surprise at God's choice for her field of study. "Tax law? I hate taxes," she said. "Why should I go and do something like that?" Still, she sucked it up and did as she was told. "The Lord says: Be submissive, wives, you are to be submissive to your husbands."
Moving back to Minnesota, she and Marcus settled in Stillwater, a town of 18,000 near St. Paul, where they raised their five children and took in 23 foster kids. Stillwater is a Midwestern version of a Currier & Ives set piece, complete with cozy homes, antique stores — and no black people. In short, the perfect launching pad for a political career built on Bachmann's retro-Stepford image. Stillwater's congressional district is the whitest district in Minnesota (95 percent) and one of the wealthiest in America (with a median income $16,000 above the national average).
Michele took a job as a tax attorney collecting for the IRS and spent the next four years sucking on the tit of the Internal Revenue Service, which makes her Tea Party-leader hypocrisy quotient about average. (At least she didn't collect more than $250,000 in federal farm subsidies between 1995 and 2006 — that was her father-in-law.) It was after Bachmann quit the IRS in 1993 that her political career really began; although she had volunteered for Jimmy Carter in her youth and had been an anti-abortion protester, she didn't become a major player in Stillwater until she joined a group of fellow Christian activists to form New Heights, one of the first charter schools in America.
Anyone wanting to understand how President Bachmann might behave should pay close attention to what happened at New Heights. Because the school took government money, like other charter schools, it had to maintain a separation of church and state, and Bachmann was reportedly careful to keep God out of the initial outlines of the school's curriculum. But before long, parents began to complain that Bachmann and her cronies were trying to bombard the students with Christian dogma — advocating the inclusion of something called the "12 Biblical Principles" into the curriculum, pushing the teaching of creationism and banning the showing of the Disney movie Aladdin because it promoted witchcraft.
"One member of Michele's entourage talked about how he had visions, and that God spoke to him directly," recalled Denise Stephens, a parent who was opposed to the religious curriculum at New Heights. "He told us that as Christians we had to lay our lives down for it. I remember getting in the car with my husband afterward and telling him, 'This is a cult.'"
Under pressure from parents, Bachmann resigned from New Heights. But the experience left her with a hang-up about the role of the state in public education. She was soon mobilizing against an educational-standards program called Profile of Learning, an early precursor to No Child Left Behind. Under the program, state educators and local businesses teamed up to craft a curriculum that would help young people prepare for the work force — but Bachmann saw through their devious scheme. "She thought it was a socialist plot to turn our children into little worker-automatons," says Bill Prendergast, a Stillwater resident who wrote for the town's newspaper and has documented every step of Bachmann's career.
The theme of socialists scheming to herd children into a factorylike system of predetermined occupations still comes up often in Bachmann's rhetoric. In a recent speech in Iowa, for instance, she talked wistfully of the early Midwest settled by her Norwegian ancestors, a place where "we can choose whatever profession we want, and no one tells us what profession we go in." Bachmann likewise rejected AmeriCorps as an attempt to build "re-education camps for young people, where young people have to go and get trained in a philosophy that the government puts forward," and blasted a schools program started by Bill Clinton for trying to brainwash kids into accepting "government central planning of our economy and our way of life."
To combat this dark outcome, Bachmann joined up with a Junior Anti-Sex League-type outfit called the Maple River Education Coalition, which was largely composed of Christian conservatives rallying against educational standards. The group met in a church, and its sessions resembled old-time religious revivals, complete with whooping and hollering. "There were enormous amounts of 'amens,'" recalls Mary Cecconi, a Stillwater resident who attended an early meeting of Maple River. "It's like a mission from God with those people." Maple River was so out there that Minnesota's then-governor, Jesse Ventura, no slouch in the batshit-conspiracy department, dismissed the group as nothing but a bunch of people who "think UFOs are landing next month."
Maple River eventually morphed into an organization called EdWatch, which railed against various dystopian indoctrination plans, including the U.N.-inspired International Baccalaureate program, offered in some American high schools. Bachmannites despise IB because its "universal" curriculum refuses to recognize the superiority of Christianity to other religions. You and I might have thought William Butler Yeats, for example, was a great poet who died half a century before the Age of Aquarius, but EdWatch calls him a "New-Age Pantheism Guru" who was aggressively "undermining Christianity."
Bachmann's anti-standards crusade led her to her first political run. In 1999, she joined four other Republicans in Stillwater in an attempt to seize control of the school board. The "Slate of Five" proved unpopular: The GOP candidates finished dead last. Bachmann learned her lesson. "Since then, she has never abdicated control of her campaign or her message to anyone," says Cecconi, who defeated Bachmann in the race — which remains the only election Bachmann has ever lost.
The slate of five had been put together by a local Republican kingpin named Bill Pulkrabek, who this spring was jailed for domestic assault after he allegedly pulled his mistress down a set of stairs by her hair. According to Pulkrabek, Bachmann initially came to him asking for advice on how to defeat Gary Laidig, a moderate Republican state senator, but he advised her to run for the school board first. "We talked about knocking Gary off later," Pulkrabek recalled. And indeed, right after the school-board fiasco, Bachmann decided to take on Laidig.
In her later telling of the story, however, Bachmann substituted a higher authority than Bill Pulkrabek. It was God, she insisted, not a girlfriend-abusing politician, who instructed her to get involved in politics. "As if we didn't have enough to do, He called me to run for the Minnesota State Senate," she said in 2006. "I had no idea, no desire to be in politics. None."
In another version of the story told by Bachmann, she ran against Laidig only because a GOP endorsing convention in April of that year spontaneously selected her, prompting yet another Home Alone extreme-surprise moment. "I came in wearing jeans, a sweatshirt and moccasins, and I had no makeup on at all," she said. "I had made not one phone call, and spent not five cents, and I did not solicit a vote." Laidig, who calls Bachmann a "cold and calculating" person, didn't buy it. "Absolute bullshit," he told reporters. "She planned this all along."
Bachmann's entire political career has followed this exact same pattern of God-speaks-directly-to-me fundamentalism mixed with pathological, relentless, conscienceless lying. She's not a liar in the traditional way of politicians, who tend to lie dully, usefully and (they hope) believably, often with the aim of courting competing demographics at the same time. That's not what Bachmann's thing is. Bachmann lies because she can't help it, because it's a built-in component of both her genetics and her ideology. She is at once the most entertaining and the most dangerous kind of liar, a turbocharged cross between a born bullshit artist and a religious fanatic, for whom lying to the infidel is a kind of holy duty.
It has taken just over 10 years for Bachmann to go from small-town PTA maven to serious presidential contender, a testament to both her rare and unerring talent for generating media attention, and to her truly astonishing energy level and narcissistic tenacity. Minnesota politicians who have squared off against Bachmann all speak with a kind of horrified reverence for her martial indomitability, her brilliantly fortifying lack of self-doubt, even the fact that she hasn't appeared to physically age at all in 10 years. "She will not stop," says Cecconi.
Bachmann ended up unseating Laidig — and since then, getting herself elected is pretty much the only thing she has accomplished in politics. That's not an exaggeration: As both a state senator and a congresswoman, Michele Bachmann has never passed a piece of meaningful legislation. Her time in the Minnesota legislature was concentrated in two lengthy and unsuccessful protest campaigns. The first was a jeremiad against school standards, which fizzled out when Ventura's replacement, then-governor and current presidential rival Tim Pawlenty, backed his own version of school standards with the coming of No Child Left Behind. The other was a hysterical campaign against gay marriage that involved some of the strangest behavior ever attributed to an American elected official.
In 2003, after the Massachusetts Supreme Court issued its famous ruling permitting gay marriage, Bachmann proposed an amendment to the Minnesota constitution banning gay marriage — despite the fact that the state legislature had already passed a law making same-sex unions illegal. Even the politicians who were sufficiently gay-phobic to have passed the original anti-marriage law were floored by the brazen pointlessness of Bachmann's bill. "It's unnecessary, it's redundant, it's duplicative," said Assistant Senate Majority Leader Ann Rest.
The episode was classic Bachmann, whose political strategy throughout her career has mostly revolved around having her Little House on the Never-Existed Fundamentalist Prairie sensibilities rocked by something she has read (or misread) in the news, then immediately proposing a horseshit, total-waste-of-everybody's-time legislative action in response. In 2009, after she saw a news story about the Chinese calling on the world to abandon the dollar as its reserve currency, Bachmann somehow took this to mean that the Obama administration might force ordinary Americans to abandon their familiar green dollar bills for some international and no doubt atheist currency. To combat this possibility, Bachmann introduced a resolution to "bar the dollar from being replaced by any foreign currency." Even after the gaffe was made public, Bachmann pressed on, challenging Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to "categorically renounce the United States moving away from the dollar." Imagine Joe McCarthy dragging Cabinet members into hearings and demanding that they publicly disavow the works of Groucho Marx, and you get a rough idea of the general style of Bachmannian politics.
Bachmann's anti-gay crusade in Minnesota was born of similar stuff. Right from the start, she made sure that everyone knew the awesome importance of the task she was taking on, trying to outlaw an already outlawed practice. "This is probably the biggest issue that will impact our state and our nation in, at least, the last 30 years," she said. She called gay marriage an "earthquake issue," insisting that failure to pass her proposal would mean that "sex curriculum would essentially be taught by the gay community" and that "little K-12 children will be forced to learn that homosexuality is normal, natural, and perhaps they should try it." Much as Sarah Palin's actual speeches sometimes melt indistinguishably into Tina Fey's SNL parodies, Bachmann's anti-gay rhetoric at times features a campy, over-the-top quality that makes it hard to tell her apart from a tranny cabaret act. She described the gay lifestyle as "bondage" and "personal enslavement," even claiming that suicide among gay teens is due not to discrimination but to "the fact of what they're doing."
Bachmann's obsession with gay culture led her to bizarre behavioral extremes. In April 2005, after the State Senate refused to even vote on her constitutional amendment, she hid in the bushes outside the State Capitol during a gay-rights rally. A photo shows Bachmann, only the top of her Stepford head visible, crouched alone in an extreme catcher's squat behind the Capitol shrubbery. She later insisted she wasn't hiding at all, but resting because her heels hurt.
That same year tensions between Bachmann and some gay activists grew heated during a town-hall meeting she attended. Depending on whom you believe — and by that I mean which of Bachmann's own competing versions of the story you believe — Bachmann either left the meeting to avoid the activists, or excused herself to "use the restroom" only to be "held against her will" there by what may or may not have been a pair of angry lesbians. She reported the incident to the Washington County sheriff: "Sen. Bachman [sic] stated that when she was trying to leave, 2 women blocked her in and told her they wanted to continue talking. Sen. Bachman stated she was afraid and screamed for help. The 2 women let her leave the restroom when she screamed."
Images of Michele Bachmann squatting behind a bush or hiding from lesbians in a bathroom would seem to be punch lines of funny stories, but they are not. The real punch line is that rather than destroying her politically, these incidents helped propel her into Congress. In her first two races, in 2006 and 2008, she defeated experienced, credible opponents who failed to realize what they were dealing with until it was too late. Her 2006 win was an especially extraordinary testament to her electoral viability. In a terrible year for conservatives, with the death-spiraling Bush administration taking Republican seats down with them all over the country, Bachmann won a fairly independent district by an eight-point margin. In her runs for Congress, Bachmann discovered — or perhaps it is more accurate to say we all discovered — that a total absence of legislative accomplishment and a complete inability to tell the truth or even to identify objective reality are no longer hindrances to higher office.
Emboldened by the lack of consequences for her early freakouts, Bachmann's self-mythologizing became more and more overt. In October 2006, she stepped before a packed house at the Living Word Christian Center in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, and told her life story. All of history's great madmen have had that one gorgeous moment where the cackling hairy hunchback that has been gestating within for years finally comes out and shows itself, strutting up and down the catwalk for the world to see. This was Michele's catwalk moment, a lengthy autobiographical speech in which she claimed "callings" from God had pushed her to every major decision in her life — from studying tax law to running for Congress. She even told the congregation that she and hubby Marcus — who by then had opened a Christian counseling center — had been united not by love but by a unique series of divine visions experienced by three people simultaneously.
Bachmann claimed that back in her college days, she was up one night praying with a female friend of hers when "the Lord gave each one of us the same, exact vision... It was a picture of me, marrying this man, in the valley where his parents have a farm in western Wisconsin." Meanwhile, miles away, Marcus "was repairing a fence on the farm where he worked, and the Lord showed him in a vision that he was supposed to marry me." According to Bachmann, Marcus initially complained to God that he wanted to see the world first, and only later relented.
Snickering readers in New York or Los Angeles might be tempted by all of this to conclude that Bachmann is uniquely crazy. But in fact, such tales by Bachmann work precisely because there are a great many people in America just like Bachmann, people who believe that God tells them what condiments to put on their hamburgers, who can't tell the difference between Soviet Communism and a Stafford loan, but can certainly tell the difference between being mocked and being taken seriously. When you laugh at Michele Bachmann for going on MSNBC and blurting out that the moon is made of red communist cheese, these people don't learn that she is wrong. What they learn is that you're a dick, that they hate you more than ever, and that they're even more determined now to support anyone who promises not to laugh at their own visions and fantasies.
Bachmann is the champion of those tens of millions of Americans who have read and enjoyed the Left Behind books, the apocalyptic works of Christian fiction that posit an elaborate fantasy in which all the true believers are whisked off to heaven with a puff of smoke at the outset of Armageddon. Here on Earth, meanwhile, the guilty are bent to the will of a marauding Satan who appears at first in the guise of a smooth-talking, handsome, educated, pro-government, superficially pacifist, internationalist politician named Nicolae Carpathia — basically, Barack Obama. Bachmann has ties to the Left Behind crowd and has even said that Beverly LaHaye, wife of LB co-author and fundamentalist godfather Tim LaHaye, was her inspiration for entering politics.
As Bachmann has told and retold her story as one of divine inspiration, she has recast her biography in ever more grandiose directions. A great example is the issue of her "28 children." Bachmann has five kids and, something even her most withering critic should acknowledge, has cared for 23 foster kids. But in 2008 — 10 years after any of her foster children had been in her home — Bachmann was talking as though she was still dashing home from Congress to cook for them. "Every weekend now when I go home, I will go to the grocery store, I'll buy food for the family," she said. "We have five kids and 23 foster kids that we raise. So I go to the grocery store and buy a lot of food."
It is difficult to tell whether this sort of thing is delusion, artifice or both. "I think Michele honestly believes whatever she says in the moment," says Cecconi.
It was the same in October 2008, when Bachmann went on Hardball With Chris Matthews and effectively accused both her fellow members of Congress and soon-to-be-president Barack Obama of being witches who should be thrown in a lake to see if they sank from lack of patriotism. "I wish the American media would take a great look at the views of the people in Congress and find out, are they pro-America or anti-America?" she said. "I think people would love to see an exposé like that." When the comment sparked a furious controversy, Bachmann responded by blaming Matthews, insisting that "I did not suggest the word 'anti-American.'" She wasn't mad that she was misquoted — she was furious because her views had been conveyed accurately, in a live television interview.
"There's always this mechanism available to Bachmann," says Elwyn Tinklenberg, the Democrat she defeated in the congressional election that fall. "No matter what they say, there is this attitude that 'these poor Christians are being picked on.'" Cecconi agrees, saying that Bachmann has discovered her blunders only serve to underscore her martyrdom. "I've seen her parlay that into 'Look how downtrodden I am,'" she says. "It works for her."
Given how Bachmann's stature rises every time she does something we laugh at, it's no wonder she's set her strangely unfocused eyes on the White House. Since arriving in Congress, she has been a human tabloid-copy machine, spouting one copy-worthy lunacy after another. She launched a fierce campaign against compact fluorescent lights, claiming that the energy-saving bulbs contain mercury and pose a "very real threat to children, disabled people, pets, senior citizens." She blasted the 2010 census as a government plot and told people not to comply because the U.S. Constitution doesn't require citizens to participate, when in fact it does. She told her constituents to be "armed and dangerous" in their resistance to cap-and-trade limits on climate-warming pollution. She insisted that Obama's trip to India cost taxpayers $200 million a day, and claimed that Nancy Pelosi had spent $100,000 on booze on state-paid flights aboard military jets.
This is not to say that Bachmann hasn't played a prominent role in Congress. Most significantly, she cannily positioned herself as the congressional champion of the Tea Party; last summer she formed a Tea Party caucus, which she now leads. The public has become acquainted with some of Bachmann's other excellent qualities as a politician — her TV-ready looks, her easy confidence in public speaking, her quick command of a mountainous database of (frequently bogus) facts — but often overlooked is her greatest quality, the gigantic set of burnished titanium Terminator-testicles swinging under her skirt.
While other Republicans floundered in the wreckage of the post-Bush era, Bachmann boldly presented herself as an unfazed, unbowed answer to Obama, leading the GOP charge to overturn the president's two signature legislative efforts, the health care bill and Wall Street reform. That she hasn't actually succeeded is beside the point; at a time when other Republicans seem weighed down by the party's recent failures, Bachmann has pressed on like she isn't even aware of them — which, of course, is a distinct possibility.
At the republican debate at St. Anselm College in New Hampshire on June 13th, which marked the unofficial beginning of the GOP presidential race, Bachmann wiped the floor with the other candidates — admittedly not a terribly difficult thing to do, given that this may be the sorriest group of presidential hopefuls ever assembled. Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Herman Cain, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Tim Pawlenty looked like a bunch of rumpled businessmen in a subway car watching an old lady get mugged, each waiting for the other to do something about it. Bachmann, by contrast, radiated confidence and energy — prompting Washington Post columnist Ezra Klein to wonder if he had been right when he half-jokingly suggested that "Michele Bachmann is the candidate Sarah Palin was supposed to be."
Here's the difference between Bachmann and Palin: While Palin is clearly bored by the dreary, laborious aspects of campaigning and seems far more interested in gobbling up the ancillary benefits of reality-show celebrity, Bachmann is ruthlessly goal-oriented, a relentless worker who has the attention span to stay on message at all times. With a little imagination, you can even see a clear path for her to the nomination. Though she outraged Des Moines Republicans by blowing off a party dinner in late May, she had already visited the state four times this year and scored key endorsements there. Obamacare progenitor Mitt Romney has already half-conceded Iowa by dropping out of the straw poll there, leaving fellow Minnesotan Tim Pawlenty as Bachmann's main competition for the first big prize of the race.
Pawlenty and Bachmann have tangled for years over a variety of issues ranging from school standards to health care to a cigarette tax. Pawlenty reportedly views Bachmann's decision to jump in and spoil his long-planned assault on the presidency as the equivalent to her having crouched over and peed in his Cheerios. Asked about Bachmann's run, Pawlenty seethed, "I'm not running for comic- or entertainer-in-chief."
Even other Republicans, it seems, are making the mistake of laughing at Bachmann. But consider this possibility: She wins Iowa, then swallows the Tea Party and Christian vote whole for the next 30 or 40 primaries while Romney and Pawlenty battle fiercely over who is the more "viable" boring-white-guy candidate. Then Wall Street blows up again — and it's Barack Obama and a soaring unemployment rate versus a white, God-fearing mother of 28 from the heartland.
It could happen. Michele Bachmann has found the flaw in the American Death Star. She is a television camera's dream, a threat to do or say something insane at any time, the ultimate reality-show protagonist. She has brilliantly piloted a media system that is incapable of averting its eyes from a story, riding that attention to an easy conquest of an overeducated cultural elite from both parties that is far too full of itself to understand the price of its contemptuous laughter. All of those people out there aren't voting for Michele Bachmann. They're voting against us. And to them, it turns out, we suck enough to make anyone a contender.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)